Morality Plays

Morality Plays ?

Morality plays were a popular form of drama in medieval Europe, particularly from the 15th to early 17th centuries. These plays used allegory to teach moral lessons, often focusing on the struggle between good and evil and the consequences of human behavior. The characters in these plays were typically personifications of virtues, vices, or abstract concepts, such as Good Deeds, Vice, Death, Truth, and Sin.

Key Features of Morality Plays:

1. Allegorical Characters: Characters often represent abstract qualities like Goodness, Greed, or Knowledge. The protagonist typically represents Everyman (a symbol of all humanity), who is faced with moral choices.
2. Moral Instruction: The plays aimed to teach audiences the difference between right and wrong and the consequences of their actions, urging people to lead virtuous lives to avoid damnation.
3. Conflict: The main plot often revolves around the protagonist’s struggle between salvation (through virtue) and damnation (through vice).
4. Religious Themes: Many morality plays were based on Christian teachings and often presented themes like sin, repentance, and redemption.
5. Simple and Direct: The plays were straightforward and often lacked complex plots or deep character development. The focus was on conveying clear moral lessons.

Famous Examples:

1. Everyman (c. 1495): This is perhaps the most famous morality play. The protagonist, Everyman, represents all of humanity and is summoned by Death to make an account of his life. As he prepares for his reckoning, he seeks help from various allegorical figures like Good Deeds, Knowledge, and Fellowship.
2. Mankind (c. 1465): A late medieval play that explores the theme of human fallibility, focusing on the character Mankind and his struggle to resist temptations represented by characters such as Vice, Abstinence, and Conscience.

Decline and Legacy:

By the late Renaissance, morality plays began to lose popularity as more sophisticated forms of theater, such as the Elizabethan drama, developed. However, their influence is still seen in later theatrical works, especially in the use of allegorical characters and themes of moral conflict.

Morality plays played a crucial role in the development of early Western theater by combining religious didacticism with dramatic performance, influencing later theatrical forms in England and beyond.

What is Morality Plays ?

Morality plays are a type of medieval drama that emerged in Europe around the 15th century. These plays were designed to teach moral lessons, often based on Christian teachings, and used allegory to depict the struggle between good and evil. The characters in morality plays were typically personifications of abstract qualities such as Virtue, Vice, Good Deeds, Sin, or Death, and the stories often centered on the moral choices and spiritual journey of the protagonist, who represented “Everyman” (or humanity in general).

Key Characteristics of Morality Plays:

1. Allegorical Characters: The characters often personified virtues (like Goodness or Truth) or vices (like Greed or Lust). For example, the protagonist might be named Everyman or Humanity, representing all people.
2. Moral and Religious Themes: These plays were intended to teach the audience about Christian moral values, focusing on salvation, sin, repentance, and the ultimate judgment of the soul. The central theme was usually the choice between good and evil, leading to either eternal salvation or damnation.
3. Simple Plot Structure: Morality plays usually had a straightforward, didactic plot, where the protagonist faced a series of challenges, often choosing between the guidance of virtues or temptations from vices.
4. Interactive and Educational: Morality plays often involved direct lessons to the audience, encouraging reflection on how their actions aligned with moral principles.

Famous Examples:

• Everyman (c. 1495): The most famous morality play, in which the protagonist Everyman is called by Death to account for his life. He seeks assistance from various allegorical figures like Good Deeds, Fellowship, and Knowledge, who help him on his spiritual journey.
• Mankind (c. 1465): A play focusing on the character Mankind as he faces temptations represented by allegorical figures like Vice and Abstinence, demonstrating the conflict between good and evil.

Purpose:

Morality plays were designed to instruct and entertain. They were often performed in public spaces like town squares or at religious festivals and were a tool for teaching the common people about Christian ethics and the importance of moral behavior.

While morality plays were influential in medieval and early Renaissance theater, they eventually faded as more complex forms of drama emerged, particularly during the Renaissance. However, their emphasis on moral conflict and allegorical characters influenced later theatrical works.

Who is required Morality Plays ?

Morality plays were primarily created for and performed in front of common people in medieval Europe, particularly from the 15th to the 17th centuries. They were designed to serve both educational and entertainment purposes. The specific groups who “required” or benefited from these plays include:

1. Common People:

• Moral and Religious Instruction: Morality plays were aimed at teaching the general population about Christian morality, especially in a time when many people were illiterate. They helped convey religious lessons in an engaging way, emphasizing the importance of living a virtuous life to attain salvation.
• Understanding of Sin and Virtue: Many people in medieval Europe had limited access to religious texts, so these plays provided a vivid, visual means of understanding complex theological and ethical concepts, such as sin, redemption, and the consequences of one’s actions.

2. The Church and Religious Authorities:

• Promotion of Christian Teachings: Morality plays were often sponsored by the church or religious groups as a way to promote Christian values. The church wanted to ensure that people understood the importance of leading a righteous life and adhering to religious teachings, especially in an era when literacy rates were low and the Bible was not as widely accessible.
• Didactic Tool: The clergy used these plays as an educational tool to reinforce religious lessons. Since many morality plays centered around biblical themes, they helped communicate the idea of salvation and the eternal battle between good and evil.

3. Theater Performers and Artists:

• Entertainment and Livelihood: Morality plays were performed by actors and traveling theater troupes who gained income from performing these plays for both religious and secular audiences. These plays provided an accessible form of entertainment, as well as an opportunity for performers to showcase their acting skills.

4. Nobles and Rulers:

• Moral Example and Leadership: While the primary audience was common people, members of the aristocracy and rulers sometimes attended these plays as well. The plays often reinforced ideas of good governance, the importance of virtue, and the role of leaders in maintaining moral order in society. Nobles may have used them to reflect on their own responsibilities and moral standing.

5. Theaters and Civic Institutions:

• Civic or Religious Festivals: Morality plays were commonly performed at festivals, particularly during religious celebrations such as Easter and Christmas. Towns or cities with civic or religious institutions often sponsored these performances to maintain moral order in society and to celebrate religious occasions.

Purpose of the Morality Plays:

• Moral Teaching: At their core, morality plays were created to instill moral and ethical lessons about the consequences of one’s actions, especially in relation to the Christian understanding of good and evil.
• Entertainment: They also served as entertainment, using drama, dialogue, and often humor to engage the audience while conveying serious moral lessons.

In summary, morality plays were primarily required by the common people for moral and religious education, but they were also supported and promoted by the church and civic institutions as tools for social and religious instruction. Additionally, they provided an opportunity for performers to entertain and earn a living, while offering a way for nobles to reinforce moral leadership.

When is required Morality Plays ?

Morality plays were most commonly performed during the late Middle Ages and the early Renaissance, particularly from the 15th century to the early 17th century. They were most frequently staged during times and in contexts where moral and religious instruction was needed or sought by society.

Specific Periods and Contexts When Morality Plays Were Required:

1. Late Middle Ages (14th to 15th Century):
   • Religious and Social Context: During this period, the Catholic Church had a central role in everyday life. The church used morality plays to teach moral values, particularly to an illiterate population, as many people could not read the Bible. These plays were a means of communicating Christian ethics and religious doctrine to the common people.
   • Religious Festivals and Holy Days: Morality plays were commonly performed during religious festivals like Easter, Christmas, and Feast Days of saints. They were a part of civic or religious celebrations and were used to remind people of their moral duties in line with Christian teachings.
2. Renaissance (16th Century):
   • Moral Instruction for Society: As society evolved during the Renaissance, people began to focus more on individual moral choices and the concept of personal salvation. Morality plays continued to be an important form of popular drama, helping the public navigate changing social and religious landscapes.
   • Theatrical Tradition: The Renaissance also saw the development of theater as a more formal entertainment medium. While morality plays were still common in the early part of this era, they began to decline as more sophisticated forms of drama (like Elizabethan theater) emerged, with playwrights like Shakespeare moving beyond the allegorical simplicity of morality plays.
3. Public Events or Civic Duty:
   • Civic Celebrations: These plays were sometimes performed during civic festivals, where communities came together to reflect on their duties and moral responsibilities. For example, they could be part of celebrations aimed at reinforcing social values and ideals.
   • Traveling Troupes: Traveling theater troupes would perform morality plays in towns and villages across Europe. This allowed them to reach different communities, especially in areas where people had limited access to formal education or religious teachings.

When Were Morality Plays Particularly Needed or Required?

• Before the Rise of Literacy: In an era when literacy was not widespread, morality plays were a necessary means of educating the population about Christian principles, sin, salvation, and the afterlife.
• During Periods of Social or Religious Turmoil: In times when religious reform movements (like the Protestant Reformation) challenged the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church, morality plays were important tools for reaffirming the Church’s moral teachings and principles. They provided a way to present the church’s views to a broad audience.
• During Religious Festivals or Special Occasions: Special religious events often saw the performance of these plays, as they combined spiritual reflection with entertainment for the community.

In essence, morality plays were “required” or highly relevant during medieval and early Renaissance periods, especially when there was a need to teach and reinforce moral values, and they were commonly performed at religious festivals, civic gatherings, and other occasions where public morality and ethical instruction were needed.

When is required Morality Plays ?

Morality plays were typically required or performed during specific periods and occasions in medieval and early Renaissance Europe. These plays were often staged in contexts where there was a need for moral instruction, particularly for an audience that may not have been literate or had access to formal religious teachings. Here’s a breakdown of when morality plays were required:

1. During the Late Middle Ages (14th to 15th Century)

• Religious and Moral Instruction: In this period, the Catholic Church held significant authority, and morality plays were required to teach moral and Christian values, especially to illiterate populations. The plays helped convey the Church’s messages about sin, salvation, and repentance.
• Public Festivals and Religious Holidays: Morality plays were often performed during religious festivals (such as Christmas or Easter), which were key times for reflecting on spiritual matters. These festivals provided a convenient time to remind people of the Christian teachings they were expected to follow.

2. During the Renaissance (16th Century)

• Moral Reflection and Social Change: As the Renaissance saw increasing interest in humanism and individual responsibility, morality plays were still required to instruct people on the importance of leading a virtuous life. They continued to be popular in the early part of this period, even as more sophisticated theatrical forms (like Elizabethan drama) began to emerge.
• Religious Reform and Conflict: The Protestant Reformation in the 16th century also created a context where religious instruction and moral reflection were especially needed. Morality plays served to uphold Catholic teachings or challenge reformist ideas, depending on the region.

3. Public and Civic Occasions

• Civic Celebrations: Morality plays were sometimes performed at civic celebrations or festivals, which were held to promote social values and community morality. These events often focused on themes such as justice, virtue, and the responsibilities of citizens.
• Town Squares and Markets: Traveling theater troupes would perform morality plays in town squares or public markets, making them an accessible form of education and entertainment for the common people.

4. When Moral and Ethical Guidance Was Needed

• For Illiterate Populations: In a time when many people could not read the Bible or access written texts, morality plays were an important tool for providing moral guidance. They used simple, allegorical narratives to illustrate Christian moral lessons, and therefore, were required when there was a need to make religious and moral teachings understandable to the masses.
• During Periods of Social or Religious Change: Morality plays were also performed in times of religious or social upheaval, such as during the Black Death or periods of political turmoil. These were times when people sought reassurance through religious teachings and moral reflection.

Summary:

Morality plays were required primarily during the medieval period and the Renaissance when there was a need to communicate moral and Christian lessons to the general population. They were most commonly performed during religious festivals, civic events, or at times when moral guidance was especially needed for an illiterate or struggling population. As public morality, spiritual reflection, and religious teachings were central during this period, morality plays provided a practical way to convey these concepts.

COURTESY : Portland Community College

Where is required Morality Plays ?

Morality plays were typically required or performed in places where public instruction, religious teachings, and entertainment intersected. These plays were performed in locations that facilitated their educational and social functions, particularly in medieval and early Renaissance Europe. Here’s where they were most commonly staged:

1. Town Squares and Public Spaces:

• Town squares were a common venue for the performance of morality plays. These were central, accessible places where townspeople could gather, and where traveling theater troupes could perform for large audiences.
• Markets and Fairs: Public markets and fairs were also venues where morality plays were staged, especially during religious festivals or public celebrations. These places attracted people from all walks of life, including those who might not have had regular access to formal education or religious instruction.

2. Churches and Religious Locations:

• Churches: Many morality plays were performed in or near churches, especially as part of church festivals or holy days. Churches were the center of medieval spiritual life, and these plays were an extension of the church’s mission to teach moral lessons and reinforce Christian values.
• Church Courtyards or Churchyards: In some cases, morality plays were performed in the churchyard or courtyard. These settings allowed the community to come together for both spiritual reflection and entertainment, especially during important religious events.

3. Civic and Religious Festivals:

• Religious Festivals: Plays were often required and performed during important religious festivals, such as Christmas, Easter, Pentecost, and Feast Days of saints. These festivals were times when people came together for religious observance, and morality plays were used to reinforce the moral teachings of the church.
• Civic Festivals: In some cases, morality plays were performed during public or civic celebrations, which might include holidays, coronations, or other significant community events. These occasions often sought to reinforce social unity and moral behavior, making morality plays an ideal medium for such purposes.

4. Royal Courts and Nobility Settings:

• While royal courts and noble houses were not the primary locations for morality plays, they sometimes staged them for the entertainment and moral instruction of the elite. These performances might have been more sophisticated and less allegorical, but they still often carried moral and religious themes. Noble audiences could also sponsor these plays for public performance.

5. Theater Halls or Playhouses:

• As theater became more organized in the late medieval and early Renaissance periods, some purpose-built playhouses and theater halls began to host morality plays. The rise of formal theater spaces, especially in cities like London, saw the plays being performed in a more organized and professional setting.
• Guild Halls: In some places, guilds (associations of tradespeople or artisans) sponsored performances of morality plays in their guild halls. These guilds often played a role in the organization of community events and religious celebrations.

6. Travelling Troupes and Mobile Performances:

• Traveling Troupes: Theater troupes that traveled from town to town also performed morality plays. These traveling groups brought moral teachings to villages and cities across Europe. In rural areas where people had limited access to education and religious teachings, the plays were especially valuable as a form of entertainment and instruction.

Summary:

Morality plays were required to be performed in public spaces such as town squares, churches, and marketplaces to reach the widest possible audience, especially the common people who needed moral and religious education. They were also performed in churchyards, civic festivals, and at the courts of the nobility. As formal theater spaces developed, playhouses and guild halls became common venues for such performances. These plays were primarily staged where communities gathered for religious, social, and civic events, ensuring that the moral lessons of the plays reached as many people as possible.

How is required Morality Plays ?

Morality plays were required in specific ways that were tied to both cultural needs and religious purposes in medieval and early Renaissance society. These plays were a form of drama that served both educational and entertainment functions, and their structure, themes, and performance methods made them effective for moral instruction. Here’s how morality plays were required or served their purpose:

1. Through Allegory:

• Allegorical Representation: Morality plays were structured around allegorical characters—personifications of virtues (e.g., Good Deeds, Truth, Knowledge) and vices (e.g., Greed, Lust, Sin). This made the moral lessons clear and accessible to people of all literacy levels. The use of abstract concepts helped convey complex moral and religious ideas in a way that was easy to understand, especially for an illiterate audience.

2. Moral and Religious Education:

• Teaching Right from Wrong: The central function of morality plays was to teach moral values based on Christian principles. These plays were often required to instruct people on the importance of living a virtuous life and avoiding sin, with the ultimate message being that living a righteous life would lead to salvation, while a sinful life would lead to damnation.
• Reinforcing Religious Teachings: Morality plays were required by the Church and religious authorities as part of a broader effort to ensure the public understood and adhered to Christian teachings. These plays were an accessible form of instruction, reinforcing the moral messages found in Scripture and church doctrine.

3. Public Performance for Widespread Reach:

• Engaging a Broad Audience: Morality plays were required in public spaces (e.g., town squares, churchyards, and marketplaces) because they were designed to reach a wide audience, including those who could not read or access religious texts. The plays were typically performed during religious festivals or civic celebrations, making them part of the communal experience.
• Visual and Accessible Drama: Through performance, dialogue, and visual elements, the plays brought the moral lessons to life. The physical and emotional engagement of live performance ensured that the messages of morality and salvation were not just heard but also experienced.

4. Interactive and Didactic:

• Moral Reflection: Morality plays were designed to encourage the audience to reflect on their own lives and the choices they made. The protagonist often faced moral dilemmas, representing the struggle between good and evil. The audience was encouraged to identify with the characters and apply the lessons learned to their own lives.
• Direct Instruction: The plays often included moments of direct address or moral speeches, where characters would explain the lessons they had learned or offer guidance to the audience. This made the plays both entertaining and instructive.

5. Engagement with Sin, Repentance, and Redemption:

• Struggle with Sin: The protagonist in many morality plays, such as in Everyman, was required to confront the consequences of their actions, often symbolizing humanity’s journey from sin to redemption. Characters representing vices would tempt the protagonist, while those representing virtues would guide them toward repentance and salvation.
• Focus on Redemption: The overarching theme of these plays was that redemption was possible through repentance and moral correction. This was a key element required in these plays, as it provided hope for salvation and reaffirmed the possibility of moral change.

6. Simplified Messages for Broad Understanding:

• Clear Moral Outcomes: Morality plays were required to be simple in their narrative structure and easy to follow. The characters and their actions were symbolic, so the moral outcomes were generally clear-cut. Virtue would triumph over vice, and salvation would follow repentance and good deeds. This clarity ensured that the audience could easily grasp the lesson without confusion.

7. Entertainment and Community Engagement:

• Theatrical and Emotional Appeal: While the main purpose of morality plays was moral instruction, they were also required to be entertaining. The dramatic elements, including conflict, dialogue, and often humor, made them engaging for the audience. These plays were designed to not only teach but also entertain, making them an effective tool for both religious and social engagement.
• Social and Communal Role: By being performed during community gatherings and public festivals, morality plays were required to be an integral part of the social fabric, reinforcing both moral teachings and communal identity. They helped bond people together through shared moral experiences and reflections.

8. Social Control and Reflection of Morality:

• Reinforcement of Social Norms: Morality plays were required as part of the broader effort to maintain social order. By showcasing the consequences of immoral actions and highlighting virtuous behavior, these plays acted as a form of social control, encouraging the audience to adhere to moral codes that aligned with both religious and societal expectations.
• Reflection of Collective Morality: These plays also provided a way for communities to reflect on their collective morality, helping them think about how they wanted to live together in a just and virtuous society.

Conclusion:

Morality plays were required as a means to educate, entertain, and moralize medieval and early Renaissance societies. They were required because they provided clear, accessible moral and religious teachings, reinforced social norms, and helped people reflect on their own lives in an engaging and communal way. Their allegorical structure, simple messaging, and public performances made them essential tools for moral instruction and spiritual guidance during a time when literacy was limited, and religious teachings needed to reach a broad audience.

Case study is Morality Plays ?

A case study of morality plays would involve an in-depth analysis of how these plays functioned in society, focusing on a specific play or a group of plays to explore their themes, structure, impact, and historical context. Here, we can look at “Everyman”, one of the most famous and studied examples of a morality play, to serve as a case study.

---

Case Study: “Everyman” (c. 1495)

Overview: “Everyman” is a classic example of a morality play, and it reflects the essential features and goals of the genre. It focuses on the journey of the central character, Everyman, who is summoned by Death to face his final reckoning before God. Along the way, he seeks help from allegorical characters representing various aspects of life, such as Good Deeds, Fellowship, Knowledge, and Riches. Ultimately, Everyman learns that only Good Deeds can accompany him to the afterlife, emphasizing the Christian themes of salvation, repentance, and the transient nature of worldly attachments.

1. Historical Context:

• Medieval Christianity: The play was written during a time when Christian morality was central to everyday life. The medieval period was a time when the Church was the authority on moral and religious matters, and many plays were commissioned or supported by the Church as tools for teaching Christian values.
• Illiteracy and Public Instruction: Most of the population during the time of “Everyman” was illiterate, so morality plays acted as accessible tools to convey moral teachings. These plays were performed in public spaces, making them an essential means of communication about right and wrong.

2. Thematic Analysis:

• Morality and the Afterlife: The central theme of “Everyman” revolves around salvation and the consequences of one’s earthly actions. The protagonist’s journey reflects the Christian belief that material wealth, social connections, and personal achievements cannot accompany a person to the afterlife. Only Good Deeds can ensure salvation. This theme of moral reflection and accountability is central to all morality plays.
• Personification of Abstract Concepts: In the play, characters like Fellowship, Riches, and Knowledge represent abstract qualities that interact with Everyman as he faces his mortality. This allegorical style makes the play easy to understand and memorable for its audience, reinforcing Christian values about good works and the inevitable judgment each person faces.

3. Character Study:

• Everyman (Protagonist): As the central character, Everyman represents humanity in general, standing in for all people who will one day face their own death and be judged for their actions. His journey is one of spiritual awakening, where he learns that material wealth and superficial connections are fleeting and unimportant when it comes to eternal life.
• Allegorical Figures:
  • Death: The figure of Death in the play is not only a literal force but also a symbol of mortality and the Christian concept of final judgment. Everyman‘s confrontation with Death is the catalyst for his spiritual transformation.
  • Good Deeds: Good Deeds is the only character who stays with Everyman to the end, symbolizing the idea that righteous actions in life are the key to salvation.
  • Fellowship, Riches, and Strength: These characters represent the transient aspects of life that people often prioritize, yet they abandon Everyman when he needs them most, reinforcing the idea that earthly attachments cannot save a person after death.

4. Structural Elements:

• Allegorical Form: “Everyman” uses allegory, a key feature of morality plays, to personify abstract concepts. The structure of the play follows a didactic and linear narrative, with Everyman moving from one encounter to another, learning life lessons along the way.
• Dialogue and Direct Address: Characters often speak directly to the audience, offering lessons or warnings. This style of dialogue is meant to engage the audience, encouraging them to reflect on their own moral lives.

5. Impact on Audience:

• Moral Instruction: “Everyman” was required to teach its audience about the importance of good deeds and moral responsibility, not just for societal harmony, but for eternal salvation. Its clear-cut moral structure would have made it easy for audiences to understand the lessons being taught.
• Universal Message: The play’s message about the impermanence of wealth, friendship, and worldly success, and the importance of righteousness, resonates with universal concerns about life and death. By using the allegorical form, it makes these teachings applicable to all people, regardless of social status.

6. Cultural Relevance:

• Religious and Social Context: In the medieval period, when the Church played a central role in shaping societal norms and values, plays like “Everyman” were important tools for spreading religious doctrine. They were performed to reinforce moral behavior in the context of the prevailing Christian worldview.
• Entertainment and Reflection: While the play had a clear didactic purpose, it was also a form of public entertainment, engaging the audience emotionally through its characters, moral dilemmas, and the final judgment scene.

7. Modern Relevance:

• Timeless Themes: The themes explored in “Everyman” — the inevitable nature of death, the value of moral actions, and the need for repentance — remain relevant today. The play’s reflections on the importance of living a virtuous life resonate with contemporary concerns about legacy, ethics, and the choices we make in life.
• Adaptations and Influence: “Everyman” has influenced many modern works and has been adapted for various media, demonstrating the enduring power of its central themes. Its use of allegory and moral conflict can still be seen in contemporary narratives.

---

Conclusion:

The case study of “Everyman” provides a clear example of how morality plays functioned in medieval society. Through allegorical characters and a simple, straightforward plot, the play communicated essential moral teachings to an audience that might not have had access to formal education or religious texts. “Everyman” serves as a powerful tool of moral and spiritual reflection, emphasizing the transient nature of life and the importance of living virtuously in preparation for the afterlife. This case study reflects the broader role that morality plays played in shaping public understanding of Christian ethics and social values in the medieval period.

Courtesy : CULTURE & EDUCATION

White paper on Morality Plays ?

White Paper on Morality Plays

Executive Summary: Morality plays were an influential genre of medieval drama that used allegory, religious themes, and social teachings to impart moral and ethical lessons to audiences. This white paper explores the historical context, structure, themes, and impact of morality plays, with a focus on their role in moral education, religious instruction, and social control during the medieval and early Renaissance periods. It also considers the enduring relevance of morality plays and their influence on contemporary drama and culture.

---

1. Introduction

Morality plays, originating in the medieval period (roughly 14th to 16th centuries), were a key form of public theater designed to instruct audiences in moral and Christian values. These plays employed allegorical characters, such as virtues, vices, and personifications of abstract concepts (e.g., Good Deeds, Death, Knowledge), to convey messages about sin, salvation, and repentance. Often staged in town squares, churchyards, and public festivals, these plays were accessible to a broad audience, including those who could not read or write. This white paper examines the significance of morality plays in medieval society, their narrative and thematic structure, their social and religious functions, and their lasting impact.

---

2. Historical Context

2.1 The Medieval Social and Religious Landscape

The medieval period was deeply influenced by Christianity, with the Catholic Church serving as both a spiritual and cultural authority. The Church played a pivotal role in shaping societal norms, values, and laws. For most of the population, literacy rates were low, and religious teachings were primarily transmitted orally through sermons, religious rituals, and, notably, theater.

2.2 The Emergence of Morality Plays

Morality plays emerged from earlier forms of liturgical drama and mystery plays, which were based on biblical stories. Over time, these plays evolved into a distinct genre that used allegory and direct moral instruction to engage audiences. Unlike the religious mystery plays, which depicted biblical events, morality plays focused on the internal moral struggle and the choices between good and evil that individuals face throughout life.

---

3. Structure and Characteristics of Morality Plays

3.1 Allegorical Framework

Morality plays typically followed an allegorical structure, where the characters embodied abstract qualities such as Virtue, Vice, Knowledge, and Greed. The protagonist, often a representative of the common person (e.g., Everyman), interacts with these allegorical figures, who guide him through moral choices that ultimately reflect the journey of life.

3.2 Common Themes

The most common themes in morality plays include:

• Life, Death, and Judgment: Morality plays frequently focused on moral reckoning, depicting how a person’s actions on earth determine their fate in the afterlife.
• Repentance and Salvation: The plays encouraged individuals to repent for their sins and lead virtuous lives, suggesting that salvation was available through good deeds, repentance, and faith.
• The Transience of Earthly Things: Morality plays often reminded audiences that material wealth, social standing, and earthly relationships were temporary, while the soul’s salvation was eternal.
• The Battle Between Good and Evil: A key element of morality plays was the conflict between the protagonist (representing humanity) and various forces of evil (represented by vices, temptations, and sins).

3.3 Personification of Abstract Concepts

The characters in morality plays were often personifications of abstract qualities, such as:

• Good Deeds: A character who represents the righteous actions that will guide the protagonist to salvation.
• Knowledge: A figure who imparts wisdom and insight, often leading the protagonist toward moral clarity.
• Fellowship and Riches: These characters represent worldly attachments that ultimately abandon the protagonist, highlighting their inability to offer lasting value.

3.4 Dialogue and Moral Lessons

The dialogue in morality plays was designed to be straightforward and easy to follow. Characters often spoke directly to the audience, offering moral lessons and explanations of their actions. This didactic nature ensured that the message of the play was clear and accessible to all viewers.

---

4. Social and Religious Functions of Morality Plays

4.1 Moral Education and Social Control

Morality plays were required as a tool for moral education. They reinforced social and religious norms by illustrating the consequences of immoral behavior. By dramatizing the internal conflict between good and evil, they encouraged audiences to consider their own choices and ethical responsibilities. The moral teachings were not only aimed at personal salvation but also served to promote social order by reinforcing community values.

4.2 Religious Instruction

The Catholic Church saw morality plays as an effective means of teaching Christian doctrine to the masses, especially to those who were illiterate. These plays allowed the Church to communicate its messages about sin, repentance, and salvation in an accessible format. They were often performed during religious festivals, holy days, and church events, ensuring they reached a large and diverse audience.

4.3 Public Engagement and Entertainment

Morality plays were also a form of public entertainment. They were performed during festivals and civic events, combining moral instruction with theatrical spectacle. These plays were a communal experience, where people gathered in public spaces to watch performances that offered both moral reflection and enjoyment. Their use of humor, drama, and visual elements made them engaging and memorable.

---

5. Notable Examples of Morality Plays

5.1 “Everyman” (c. 1495)

One of the most famous and influential morality plays, “Everyman,” centers on a character who is summoned by Death to face his reckoning. As Everyman travels through life, he seeks the help of various allegorical figures—Fellowship, Goods, Knowledge, and Good Deeds—only to find that only Good Deeds can accompany him to the afterlife. “Everyman” emphasizes themes of repentance, the impermanence of worldly things, and the importance of living a virtuous life.

5.2 “The Castle of Perseverance” (c. 1400)

This early morality play portrays the battle between good and evil within the human soul. The central character, Everyman, represented as Man in the play, struggles to maintain his virtue while confronted by the forces of sin and temptation. The play uses allegory to portray moral decision-making and the path to salvation.

---

6. Lasting Impact and Legacy

6.1 Influence on Later Drama

Morality plays laid the groundwork for later forms of Western theater, influencing Renaissance drama and even Shakespearean plays, where themes of moral conflict, redemption, and human nature are central. The genre’s use of allegory and personification of abstract concepts also influenced later theatrical and literary traditions.

6.2 Modern Relevance

While morality plays are no longer performed as regularly as they were in medieval times, their themes—redemption, human frailty, and the consequences of moral choices—remain highly relevant today. Elements of allegory, didactic storytelling, and moral reflection continue to appear in modern media, literature, and theater.

---

7. Conclusion

Morality plays were required as tools of both moral instruction and public entertainment in the medieval period. Their allegorical structure, use of personified virtues and vices, and themes of salvation and redemption made them an effective means of engaging audiences and reinforcing the religious and social values of the time. While the practice of performing morality plays has waned, their influence on modern drama, their use of moral allegory, and their exploration of universal human experiences continue to resonate in contemporary culture

Industrial application of Morality Plays ?

The industrial application of morality plays is an interesting and creative concept. While traditionally morality plays were performed as a form of theater with the purpose of educating the public on moral values and religious teachings, their underlying principles can still be adapted to modern industrial and corporate settings. In this context, the lessons and methods of morality plays can be used to shape ethical standards, promote responsible behavior, and influence organizational culture.

Here’s an exploration of how morality play concepts can be applied within industrial and organizational frameworks:

---

1. Corporate Training and Ethical Education

Application: The key principles behind morality plays — such as the battle between good and evil, making the right decisions, and learning from moral dilemmas — can be applied to corporate training programs.

• Ethical Decision-Making Training: Using allegorical narratives similar to morality plays, companies can create training programs that help employees understand the consequences of their actions in business contexts. For instance, employees might participate in role-playing exercises or simulations where they embody characters that face moral dilemmas (e.g., honesty vs. dishonesty, integrity vs. greed). The lessons learned from these simulations can guide ethical decision-making.
• Case Studies: Morality play-style stories can be used in case studies, where employees work through situations involving issues like corporate responsibility, sustainability, and workplace integrity, helping them understand the importance of choosing morally correct actions and the long-term consequences of their decisions.

2. Promoting Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

Application: A central theme of morality plays is the consequences of one’s actions, which aligns with modern ideas of corporate social responsibility (CSR). In CSR, businesses are encouraged to act ethically and consider the broader impact of their actions on society, the environment, and their stakeholders.

• Sustainability and Environmental Responsibility: Morality plays emphasize the importance of long-term consequences for one’s actions, and companies can use these concepts to illustrate the ethical need for environmentally responsible practices. Similar to the lessons in morality plays, where the protagonist learns about the ultimate consequence of their choices, organizations can illustrate how irresponsible environmental practices (like pollution or waste) will lead to harmful outcomes for the community and future generations.
• Social Impact: Companies can use allegorical stories inspired by morality plays to demonstrate the importance of giving back to communities, promoting equality, and fostering inclusivity, helping to ensure their actions align with moral and societal standards.

3. Enhancing Workplace Culture and Values

Application: Morality plays were often about teaching individuals to reflect on their behavior and internal struggles. In a corporate setting, companies can adopt this approach to instill core organizational values and improve workplace culture.

• Internal Struggles and Ethical Challenges: Just as characters in morality plays face struggles between virtues and vices, employees can be taught to navigate internal ethical challenges, such as balancing personal interests with company values, managing interpersonal conflicts with integrity, and making decisions that align with the company’s ethical standards.
• Employee Behavior and Decision-Making: By creating a corporate narrative that personifies corporate values (such as honesty, integrity, and teamwork), companies can develop a clear sense of how employees should act in the workplace. These stories could be shared through workshops, seminars, or even internal newsletters, and they serve as examples of the moral choices employees may face.

4. Conflict Resolution and Mediation

Application: Morality plays often revolve around characters who are faced with moral dilemmas and work through them to reach a resolution. Similarly, in an industrial or corporate setting, companies can use the lessons from morality plays to frame conflict resolution and mediation processes.

• Mediation Frameworks: Just as the characters in morality plays must decide between good and evil, employees can be taught to navigate workplace disputes by considering the moral aspects of their disagreements and finding solutions that uphold the company’s values.
• Allegorical Conflict Scenarios: Creating allegorical situations similar to those in morality plays can help resolve disputes by highlighting the ethical and moral principles at stake. These types of role-playing exercises can encourage employees to empathize with each other and understand the importance of ethical behavior in resolving conflicts.

5. Leadership Development and Ethical Leadership

Application: Morality plays often feature a protagonist who must learn important moral lessons, and the growth of that character is a key part of the story. In business, these principles can be used to develop ethical leadership by helping emerging leaders understand the impact of their decisions on the company, employees, and society.

• Ethical Leadership Training: Just as morality plays portray the moral growth of the central character, businesses can focus on leadership development programs that teach leaders how to make decisions based on moral integrity. They can encourage leaders to reflect on their decisions in relation to the company’s values and ethical standards.
• Decision-Making Framework: By presenting allegorical characters representing virtue and vice, companies can show leaders how to make tough decisions while considering ethical implications. This is particularly important for leaders in industries facing complex challenges, such as healthcare, finance, and technology, where moral decision-making is often at the forefront.

6. Storytelling and Brand Messaging

Application: The storytelling techniques used in morality plays can be adapted for brand messaging and advertising strategies. Brands that focus on ethical marketing and social issues can incorporate the moral narratives of good vs. evil into their campaigns.

• Advertising Campaigns: Companies can develop ad campaigns that reflect the moral journeys consumers take when choosing products or services. For example, they might frame a product as the “virtuous” choice that aligns with ethical values, sustainability, and social responsibility, while portraying competitors as neglecting these values.
• Corporate Storytelling: Just as morality plays tell a story of redemption or downfall based on choices, brands can use storytelling to emphasize the moral lessons behind their products and services, appealing to consumers who want to make ethically sound choices.

---

7. Conclusion

The industrial application of morality plays lies in their potential to teach and reinforce ethical values in a variety of business and organizational contexts. From corporate training to conflict resolution, leadership development, and brand storytelling, the core principles of morality plays—like moral decision-making, the consequences of actions, and the struggle between virtues and vices—can be used to promote responsible behavior and ethical practices in today’s industrial world.

By adapting the allegorical, didactic, and dramatic elements of morality plays, modern organizations can create impactful narratives that not only engage employees but also promote corporate ethics, sustainability, and social responsibility in ways that resonate with both internal and external stakeholders. The timeless lessons of moral responsibility and human agency continue to be relevant, providing a rich resource for shaping a more ethical, transparent, and socially responsible industrial environment..

Research and development of Morality Plays ?

Research and Development of Morality Plays

Introduction: Morality plays are a genre of medieval theater that flourished between the 14th and 16th centuries. They were specifically designed to convey moral lessons, often using allegorical characters to represent virtues, vices, and abstract concepts like death, sin, and salvation. While morality plays were originally rooted in Christian religious instruction, the principles and structures of these plays continue to influence literature, drama, and modern entertainment. The research and development of morality plays, both in their historical context and in terms of their adaptation to contemporary settings, offer valuable insights into the intersections of ethics, theater, and social behavior.

---

1. Historical Context and Origins

1.1 Early Roots of Morality Plays

The origins of morality plays can be traced back to liturgical drama performed during the Middle Ages. The Church used drama as a tool for religious instruction and moral education. Miracle plays and mystery plays (which depicted biblical events) gradually gave way to the more didactic and allegorical structure of morality plays.

• Liturgical Drama: Derived from religious ceremonies and celebrations, early church dramas sought to communicate moral and religious messages in a manner that was accessible to a largely illiterate population.
• Allegorical Roots: Morality plays employed allegory as a central device, where abstract qualities (e.g., Good Deeds, Fellowship, Knowledge) were personified as characters to demonstrate moral lessons. For example, in “Everyman”, the protagonist is a stand-in for humanity, and characters like Death, Riches, and Good Deeds represent various aspects of life.

1.2 Development During the Medieval Period

During the late Middle Ages, the rise of vernacular theater (in local languages rather than Latin) and the increasing influence of the Catholic Church helped solidify the role of morality plays. These plays were often performed in town squares or churchyards, allowing for public education on Christian teachings.

• Religious Influence: The Church’s authority over medieval life led to the widespread use of morality plays as a means of promoting Christian ethics and salvation, reinforcing values such as good deeds, repentance, and spiritual redemption.
• Social and Political Commentary: While primarily didactic, morality plays occasionally reflected and critiqued contemporary society’s moral and political issues. Plays often subtly critiqued the corruption of religious figures, the hypocrisy of nobility, or the greed and vanity of the wealthy.

---

2. Structure and Characteristics of Morality Plays

2.1 Allegory and Symbolism

At the core of morality plays is the use of allegory and personification to teach moral lessons. Characters represent abstract concepts, often acting as both foils and guides for the protagonist, typically a common person who must make a moral decision or confront mortality.

• Personification of Concepts: Common allegorical figures include Good Deeds, Fellowship, Knowledge, Greed, Sloth, and Pride. These characters were typically portrayed in ways that reflected their moral quality—virtues were shown as helpful and noble, while vices were shown as hindrances or negative influences.
• Moral Journey: The protagonist of a morality play typically embarks on a journey (whether literal or figurative), during which they are tested by temptations or moral challenges. The journey usually ends with the protagonist learning a valuable lesson about life, death, and salvation.

2.2 Didacticism

Morality plays were didactic in nature, meaning they were primarily intended to teach audiences moral lessons. These lessons were often presented in clear terms: virtuous actions led to salvation, while sinful actions led to damnation or judgment.

• Direct Moral Messages: Morality plays were often structured to ensure that their messages were easy to grasp. Dialogues were simple, direct, and frequently involved characters giving speeches or sermons that explained moral truths in a straightforward way.
• Role of the Audience: The audience’s engagement with the play was critical. In the case of morality plays, the viewers were expected to reflect on their own behavior and moral choices, learning from the consequences faced by the protagonist.

2.3 Use of Dramatic Devices

Morality plays relied on a variety of dramatic devices to engage the audience and deliver their messages effectively. Some of the most common devices include:

• Monologues and Soliloquies: Characters often spoke directly to the audience, explaining their thoughts and actions. This direct address helped to reinforce the moral lesson.
• Contrasting Characters: The interaction between opposing characters (virtues vs. vices) created dramatic tension and highlighted the choices the protagonist must make.
• Symbolic Objects and Actions: Items such as a book of deeds, coins, or weapons often symbolized themes like morality, greed, or conflict. The actions of characters were also symbolic, demonstrating the consequences of specific choices.

---

3. Notable Examples and Development of Key Morality Plays

3.1 “Everyman” (c. 1495)

“Everyman” is perhaps the most famous morality play, epitomizing the genre’s key themes of repentance, death, and salvation. The play follows the character of Everyman as he faces Death and seeks help from various allegorical characters, only to find that only Good Deeds can accompany him to the afterlife.

• Impact: “Everyman” became a standard of the genre, with its clear moral teachings on the importance of virtuous living and repentance. The play influenced later works of drama and is considered a cornerstone of European theater.

3.2 “The Castle of Perseverance” (c. 1400)

This early morality play, often considered one of the first in English, uses a symbolic castle to represent the soul and its battle between good and evil. Characters in the play personify virtues and vices, and the protagonist must navigate these influences to maintain moral perseverance.

• Impact: “The Castle of Perseverance” developed the use of moral conflict and personification to an even greater extent, illustrating the internal struggles that every person faces.

3.3 “Mankind” (c. 1465)

In this play, the character Mankind is subjected to the temptations of characters like Abstinence, Mercy, and Pride. The play emphasizes the struggle between good and evil, with Mankind ultimately learning that only God’s grace can save him.

• Impact: “Mankind” plays with the idea of moral choice and self-control, which were central to later moral plays and inspired works focused on individual accountability.

---

4. Research in the Context of Modern Applications

4.1 Academic Research on Morality Plays

Research on morality plays has focused on several areas, including their historical significance, dramatic techniques, and impact on later theater. Scholars analyze the plays in the context of the medieval worldview, where religious beliefs, communal values, and social roles were often explored through allegory. Critical theory, such as feminist readings and Marxist interpretations, has been applied to explore themes of power, gender, and class in morality plays.

• Interdisciplinary Approaches: Researchers also explore the interaction between drama, religion, and philosophy in these works, examining how the plays address moral philosophy, human agency, and the role of divine intervention.
• Performance Studies: Scholars in performance studies examine how morality plays were staged, including the use of audience interaction, visual symbols, and dramatic conventions.

4.2 Adaptations of Morality Plays in Modern Media

In contemporary media, morality play structures are still used in film, television, literature, and even video games. The fundamental narrative of the good vs. evil conflict, the internal moral struggle, and the eventual redemption or downfall of the protagonist have all become staples of modern storytelling.

• Film and Television: Modern films, especially those in the genres of drama, thriller, and fantasy, continue to draw on the traditions of morality plays. Characters in these stories often face internal and external moral dilemmas, reminiscent of the allegorical figures seen in medieval morality plays.
• Video Games: Games like The Witcher series or Mass Effect incorporate choices and consequences, allowing players to shape the moral journey of their characters, much like the moral trials faced by protagonists in morality plays.

4.3 Contemporary Applications in Business and Education

The allegorical lessons of morality plays have been adapted into corporate training programs and ethics education, where real-world scenarios are framed in a similar moral structure. Through role-playing exercises and case studies, participants learn the consequences of their ethical decisions and the value of virtuous behavior in professional settings.

---

5. Conclusion

The research and development of morality plays highlight their historical importance as tools of moral education, social commentary, and religious instruction. While rooted in the medieval period, the structure and themes of morality plays continue to influence modern storytelling, ethical education, and media production. Through allegory and dramatic confrontation between virtue and vice, these plays provided not only entertainment but also profound moral reflections, shaping the ethical frameworks of their audiences.

Courtesy : TED-Ed

References

1. ^ Jump up to:^a b c King, Pamela M. “Morality Plays.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval English Theatre, edited by Richard Beadle and Alan J. Fletcher. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008: 235-262, at 235.
2. ^ Potter, Robert. “The Ordo Virtutum: Ancestor of the English Moralities?” Comparative Drama, vol. 20, no. 1 (1986, at 203)
3. ^ Fontijn, Claire. “The Vision of Music in Saint Hildegard’s Scivias: Synthesizing Image, Text, Notation, and Theory.” Music Word Media Group, 2012:
4. ^ King, Pamela M. “Morality Plays.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval English Theatre, edited by Richard Beadle and Alan J. Fletcher. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008: 235-262, at 235.
5. ^ Jump up to:^a b Klausner, David N. “Introduction.” In Two Moral Interludes: The Pride of Life and Wisdom. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 2008
6. ^ King, Pamela M. “Morality Plays.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval English Theatre, edited by Richard Beadle and Alan J. Fletcher. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008: 235-262, at 238.
7. ^ Jump up to:^a b King, Pamela M. “Morality Plays.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval English Theatre, edited by Richard Beadle and Alan J. Fletcher. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008: 235-262, at 253.
8. ^ King, Pamela M. “Morality Plays.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval English Theatre, edited by Richard Beadle and Alan J. Fletcher. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008: 235-262, at 252.
9. ^ Everyman and Other Miracle and Morality Plays. Ed. Stanley Appelbaum and Candace Ward. New York: Dover Publications, 1995. 60. Print.
10. ^ Solberg, Emma Maggie. “A History of ‘The Mysteries.'” Early Theatre, vol. 19, no. 1 (2016): 9–36, at 12.
11. ^ “game n.” Middle English Dictionary. Ed. Robert E. Lewis, et al. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1952-2001. Online edition in Middle English Compendium. Ed. Frances McSparran, et al.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library, 2000-2021:
12. ^ Klausner, David N., ed. “The Pride of Life”. In Two Moral Interludes: The Pride of Life and Wisdom. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 2008:
13. ^ Jump up to:^a b Klausner, David N., ed. “The Castle of Perseverance”. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 2010
14. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Davidson, Clifford, Martin W. Walsh, and Ton J. Broos. “Introduction.” In Everyman and Its Dutch Original, Elckerlijc. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 2007:
15. ^ Johnson, Eleanor. Staging Contemplation: Participatory Theology in Middle English Prose, Verse, and Drama (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018): 6.
16. ^ Paulson, Julie. Theatre of the Word: Selfhood in the English Morality Play (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2019): 21.
17. ^ Baldick, Chris, ed. The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. 4th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015): 232-233.
18. ^ Jump up to:^a b Baldick, Chris, ed. The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. 4th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015): 8.
19. ^ Melion, Walter and Bart M. Ramakers. “Personification and Allegory.” Part of Personification and Allegory: Selves and Signs, at Arcade: Literature, the Humanities, & the World. Stanford University, 2021:
20. ^ Silk, Michael. “Personification and Allegory?” Part of Personification and Allegory: Selves and Signs, at Arcade: Literature, the Humanities, & the World. Stanford University, 2021:
21. ^ King, Pamela M. “Morality Plays.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval English Theatre, edited by Richard Beadle and Alan J. Fletcher. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008: 235-262, at 243.
22. ^ Johnson, Eleanor. Staging Contemplation: Participatory Theology in Middle English Prose, Verse, and Drama (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018): 184.
23. ^ Young, Andrea Louise. Vision and Audience in Medieval Drama: A Study of The Castle of Perseverance (Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015): 25.
24. ^ Young, Andrea Louise. Vision and Audience in Medieval Drama: A Study of The Castle of Perseverance (Palgrave Macmillan US, 2015): 49.
25. ^ King, Pamela M. “Morality Plays.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval English Theatre, edited by Richard Beadle and Alan J. Fletcher. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008: 235-262, at 236-37.
26. ^ King, Pamela M. “Morality Plays.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval English Theatre, edited by Richard Beadle and Alan J. Fletcher. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008: 235-262, at 237.
27. ^ Paulson, Julie. Theatre of the Word: Selfhood in the English Morality Play (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2019): 22.
28. ^ Paulson, Julie. Theatre of the Word: Selfhood in the English Morality Play (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2019): 42-43, 114.
29. ^ McCutchan, J. Wilson. “Justice and Equity in the English Morality Play.”Journal of the History of Ideas. 19.3 (1958): 406.
30. ^ Jump up to:^a b Respublica, ed. by Leonard A. Magnus (London, 1905), Extra Series XCIV.
31. ^ McCutchan, J. Wilson . “Justice and Equity in the English Morality Play.”Journal of the History of Ideas. 19.3 (1958): 408.
32. ^ Liberality and Prodigality, in A Select Collection of Old English Plays. ed. by W. Carew Hazlitt (London, 1874), VIII, 329-83.
33. ^ McCutchan, J. Wilson . “Justice and Equity in the English Morality Play.”Journal of the History of Ideas. 19.3 (1958): 409.
34. ^ Eccles, Mark. The Macro Plays (Oxford: Oxford University Press/Early English Text Society 262, 1969): xxxii.
35. ^ Eccles, Mark. The Macro Plays (Oxford: Oxford University Press/Early English Text Society 262, 1969): xxxiii.
36. ^ Eccles, Mark. The Macro Plays (Oxford: Oxford University Press/Early English Text Society 262, 1969): xvii.
37. ^ Eccles, Mark. The Macro Plays (Oxford: Oxford University Press/Early English Text Society 262, 1969): xvi-xvii.
38. ^ Kelley, Michael R. “Fifteenth-Century Flamboyant Style and The Castle of Perseverance.” Comparative Drama 6.1 (1972): 14-27.
39. ^ Wright, Clare. “Empathy with the Devil: Movement, Kinesthesia, and Affect in The Castle of Perseverance.” Theatre Survey, vol. 60, no. 2 (2019): 179-206, at 190.
40. ^ Wright, Clare. “Empathy with the Devil: Movement, Kinesthesia, and Affect in “The Castle of Perseverance.” Theatre Survey, vol. 60, no. 2 (2019): 179-206, at 196-203. Translations from Alexandra F. Johnston, The Castle of Perseverance: A Modernization (1999):
41. ^ Wright, Clare. “Empathy with the Devil: Movement, Kinesthesia, and Affect in The Castle of Perseverance.” Theatre Survey, vol. 60, no. 2 (2019): 179-206, at 191.
42. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f} Ashley, Kathleen M. and Gerard NeCastro, eds. “Mankind”. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 2010
43. ^ Johnson, Eleanor. Staging Contemplation: Participatory Theology in Middle English Prose, Verse, and Drama (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018): 173-74.
44. ^ Johnson, Eleanor. Staging Contemplation: Participatory Theology in Middle English Prose, Verse, and Drama (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018): 175-76.
45. ^ Sergi, Matthew. Practical Cues and Social Spectacle in the Chester Plays (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020): 3.
46. ^ Watkins, John. “The Allegorical Theatre: Moralities, Interludes, and Protestant Drama.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature, ed. David Wallace, 767–92, at 767-68. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
47. ^ Little, Katherine C (2018). “What Is Everyman?”. Renaissance Drama. 46 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1086/697173. S2CID 195005744.
48. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e f g h} Betteridge, Thomas; Greg, Walker (2012). “Introduction: ‘When Lyberte ruled’: Tudor Drama 1485-1603”. In Betteridge, Thomas; Walker, Greg (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Tudor Drama. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 1–20.
49. ^ Lee, Brian S. “Occupation and Idleness.” In Medieval Literature for Children, edited by Daniel T. Kline, 249–83, at 249. New York: Routledge, 2003.
50. ^ Watkins, John. “The Allegorical Theatre: Moralities, Interludes, and Protestant Drama.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature, ed. David Wallace, at 101. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
51. ^ Skelton, John. Magnyfycence. In Medieval Drama: An Anthology, edited by Greg Walker, 347–407, at 350. Wiley-Blackwell, 2000.
52. ^ Steenbrugge, Charlotte. “Morality Plays and the Aftermath of Arundel’s Constitutions.” In The Routledge Research Companion to Early Drama and Performance, ed. Pamela M. King. Routledge, 2016, at 205.
53. ^ Pineas, Rainer. “The English Morality Play as a Weapon of Religious Controversy.” SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, vol. 2, no. 2 (1962): 157-180.
54. ^ Muratta Bunsen, Eduardo (31 August 2007), “Leidenschaft des Zweifelns: Skepsis und Probabilismus in den Säkulardramen von Pedro Calderón de la Barca” [Passion of Doubt: Skepticism and Probabilism in the Secular Dramas of Pedro Calderón de la Barca], www.geisteswissenschaften.fu-berlin.de (in German), Berlin, DE: FU.